On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > > "Randall S. Becker" <rsbec...@nexbridge.com> writes: > > > Sadly, fixing the "except" thing causes the test to break now. > > That is exactly what I wanted to say. If you want to "fix" it, > you'd need to figure out what the author of the "except" thing > wanted to test, adjust the args given to test-config (it cannot be > the same as the test-config invocation of the previous test), and > then fix the typo s/except/expect/. Changing the typo alone *will* > of course make the test fail, because then the file with the > corrected name, i.e. "expect", has bogus lines that does not match > how the current invocation of "test-config" command is expected to > output.
Hi Guys, I was the original author of the test, I am sorry about the typo. I will submit a patch fixing the test. The fix can be checked at https://github.com/git/git/pull/451. 'configset_get_value' will be changed to 'configset_get_value_multi' since the test expects a list of values instead of a single value. Thanks, Tanay Abhra
