On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 5:54 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
>>
>>> I also think this is a special case of a more general problem. FOO could
>>> appear any number of times in the "env" array, as a deletion or with
>>> multiple values. Our prep_childenv() would treat that as "last one
>>> wins", I think. Could we just do the same here?
>>
>> Perhaps this should be squashed into the original 4/4 instead of
>> being a separate patch.  We'd probably want some sort of test, I
>> wonder?  Not tested at all beyond compiling...
>>
>> -- >8 --
>> Subject: [PATCH 7/4] run-command.c: don't be too cute in concatenate_env()
>>
>> Instead of relying on "sort" being stable to sort "unset VAR"
>> immediately before "VAR=VAL" to remove the former, just pick the
>> last manipulation for each VAR from the list of environment tweaks
>> and show them in the output.
>
> This is not enough.

No it is. I misunderstood string_list_insert() and my tests proved me
wrong. Sorry for the noise.
-- 
Duy

Reply via email to