On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@talktalk.net> wrote: > On 19/01/18 12:24, Phillip Wood wrote: >> >> On 18/01/18 15:35, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >>> >>> Internally, the `label <name>` command creates the ref >>> `refs/rewritten/<name>`. This makes it possible to work with the labeled >>> revisions interactively, or in a scripted fashion (e.g. via the todo >>> list command `exec`). >> >> If a user has two work trees and runs a rebase in each with the same >> label name, they'll clobber each other. I'd suggest storing them under >> refs/rewritten/<branch-name or detached HEAD SHA> instead. If the user >> tries to rebase a second worktree with the same detached HEAD as an >> existing rebase then refuse to start. >> > > Ah this isn't a concern after all as patch 5 makes refs/rewritten local > to the worktree. Perhaps you could move that part of patch 5 here or add > a note to the commit message that it will become worktree local later in > the series > > Best Wishes > > Phillip
I'd rather it be included here as well. Thanks, Jake
