Ramsay Jones <ram...@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
> On 24/01/18 12:34, Phillip Wood wrote:
>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk>
>>
>> Commit 356ee4659b ("sequencer: try to commit without forking 'git
>> commit'", 2017-11-24) forgot to run the 'prepare-commit-msg' hook when
>> creating the commit. Fix this by writing the commit message to a
>> different file and running the hook. Using a different file means that
>> if the commit is cancelled the original message file is
>> unchanged. Also move the checks for an empty commit so the order
>> matches 'git commit'.
>>
>> Reported-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk>
>> Reviewed-by: Ramsay Jones <ram...@ramsayjones.plus.com>
>
> Echoing Eric's earlier email, I don't think this Reviewed-by is
> warranted - I only requested the addition of a static keyword,
> I didn't actually review the patch.
Thanks for clarification, and I tend to agree. You, Eric and I
certainly did not review what is posted here, so if I "git am" these
patches as-is, we'd be lying.
Having said that, I think this round takes all the review comments
raised against the previous round(s) into account. So I'm tempted
to tweak them with s/Reviewed-/Helped-/ and queue.
Thanks, all.
