On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 01:36:59PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > > The test 'push --no-progress silences progress but not status' runs > > 'test_i18ngrep' without specifying a filename parameter. This has > > remained unnoticed since its introduction in e304aeba2 (t5541: test > > more combinations of --progress, 2012-05-01), because that > > 'test_i18ngrep' is supposed to check that the given pattern is not > > present in its input, and of course it won't find that pattern if its > > input is empty, (as it comes from /dev/null). This also means that > > this test could miss a potential breakage of 'git push --no-progress'. > > Oof, embarrassing. Thanks for catching. > > This and other errors make me wonder if test_i18ngrep ought to take an > explicit "-" for stdin, and error out if no file argument is given. That > may be overkill, though (and it's not like we wouldn't have the same > problem with regular "grep").
....and I really ought to start reading your entire sets of patches before commenting on the early ones. :-/ -Peff
