Hi, On Sat, 20 Jan 2018, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > > Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > > > >> Good idea! I would rather do it as an introductory patch (that only > >> converts the existing list). > >> > >> As to `merge`: it is a bit more complicated ;-) > >> > >> m, merge <original-merge-commit> ( <label> | "<label>..." ) > >> [<oneline>] > >> create a merge commit using the original merge commit's > >> message (or the oneline, if "-" is given). Use a quoted > >> list of commits to be merged for octopus merges. > > > > Is it just the message that is being reused? > > > > Aren't the trees of the original commit and its parents participate > > in creating the tree of the recreated merge? One way to preserve an > > originally evil merge is to notice how it was made by taking the > > difference between the result of mechanical merge of original merge > > parents and the original merge result, and carry it forward when > > recreating the merge across new parents. Just being curious. > > > > It looks like currently that only the commit is kept, with no attempt > to recreate evil merges. Yep. I even documented that somewhere ;-) Ciao, Dscho
