On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:01:56PM +0000, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Adam Spiers <g...@adamspiers.org> writes:
> >
> >> This series of commits attempts to make test output coloring
> >> more intuitive,...
> >
> > Thanks; I understand that this is to replace the previous one
> > b465316 (tests: paint unexpectedly fixed known breakages in bold
> > red, 2012-09-19)---am I correct?
>
> Correct. AFAICS I have incorporated all feedback raised in previous
> reviews.
>
> > Will take a look; thanks.
>
> Thanks. Sorry again for the delay. I'm now (finally) resuming work
> on as/check-ignore.
I eyeballed the test output of "pu". I do think this resolves all of the
issues brought up before, and I really hate to bikeshed on the colors at
this point, but I find that bold cyan a bit hard on the eyes when
running with "-v" (where most of the output is in that color, as it
dumps the shell for each test). Is there any reason not to tone it down
a bit like:
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 256f1c6..31f59af 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ then
pass)
tput setaf 2;; # green
info)
- tput bold; tput setaf 6;; # bold cyan
+ tput setaf 6;; # cyan
*)
test -n "$quiet" && return;;
esac
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
