Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes: > My personal favorite would be to spell out what we expect and run a diff. > When it fails, we can see what fails, and the function would look > like this:
I'd rather not to have the "sort" there; output from ls-files is meant to be stable; passing it through sort would miss breakages. I agree that comparison between "expect" and "actual" is a good idea nevertheless. Speaking of styles, I'd prefer to reserve use of "touch" to cases where resulting timestamp matters, and not "make sure it exists". Thanks. > test_expect_success CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS 'add directory (with different case)' > ' > git reset --hard initial && > mkdir -p dir1 && > mkdir -p dir1/dir2 && > touch dir1/dir2/a && > touch dir1/dir2/b && > git add dir1/dir2/a && > git add dir1/DIR2/b && > git ls-files | grep dir2 | sort >actual && > cat >expected <<-\EOF && > dir1/dir2/a > dir1/dir2/b > EOF > test_cmp expected actual > '
