On 2/8/2018 4:27 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Derrick Stolee <sto...@gmail.com> writes:
Teach git the 'commit-graph' builtin that will be used for writing and
reading packed graph files. The current implementation is mostly
empty, except for a '--pack-dir' option.
Why do we want to use "pack" dir, when this is specifically designed
not tied to packfile? .git/objects/pack/ certainly is a possibility
in the sense that anywhere inside .git/objects/ would make sense,
but using the "pack" dir smells like signalling a wrong message to
users.
I wanted to have the smallest footprint as possible in the objects
directory, and the .git/objects directory currently only holds folders.
I suppose this feature, along with the multi-pack-index (MIDX), extends
the concept of the pack directory to be a "compressed data" directory,
but keeps the "pack" name to be compatible with earlier versions.
Another option is to create a .git/objects/graph directory instead, but
then we need to worry about that directory being present.
Thanks,
-Stolee
