On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Martin Ågren wrote: > For finding this sort of low-hanging fruit (windfall?) any local > scripting and greping will do. I sort of hesitate wasting community CPU > cycles on something which might be appreciated, in theory, but that > doesn't have enough attention to move beyond "every now and then, > something is fixed, but just as often, tests gain leaks and the > blacklist gains entries". > > To sum up: I probably won't be looking into Travis-ing such a blacklist > in the near future.
Yeah, I think that's the right path for now. Hopefully we can get close to zero leaks at some point, and then think about adding this kind of infrastructure. Thanks for talking it through. -Peff
