2018-02-21 20:41 GMT+03:00 Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>:
> Olga Telezhnaya <olyatelezhn...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Get rid of goto command in ref-filter for better readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Olga Telezhnaia <olyatelezhn...@gmail.com>
>> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com>
>> Mentored by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
>> ---
>> ref-filter.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> It looks like this is the same change as the bottom-most change on
> your "cat-file --batch" series (and is obviously correct).
>
> I am puzzled by your intention---are you re-organizing and rebooting
> the series? Either 'Yes' or 'No' is an acceptable answer, and so is
> anything else. I just want to know what you want to happen to the
> merge conflicts if I queued this while still keeping your "cat-file
> --batch" thing I have on 'pu').
Thanks for the question, I needed to mention that.
We (with Peff) decided that it's better and easier to remake whole
previous patch. Before that, I want to make some refactorings in
ref-filter so after that migrating should go much easier. I want to do
that by small separate patches, so this is first in the series. I hope
it would be both easier to review for you and easier to fix for me.
So, if everything is fine, you could merge it to master. I will
rewrite most parts of previous patch anyway.
Thanks!
>
>>
>> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
>> index 83ffd84affe52..28df6e21fb996 100644
>> --- a/ref-filter.c
>> +++ b/ref-filter.c
>> @@ -1494,11 +1494,11 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item
>> *ref)
>> for (i = 0; i < used_atom_cnt; i++) {
>> struct atom_value *v = &ref->value[i];
>> if (v->s == NULL)
>> - goto need_obj;
>> + break;
>> }
>> - return;
>> + if (used_atom_cnt <= i)
>> + return;
>>
>> - need_obj:
>> get_object(ref, &ref->objectname, 0, &obj);
>>
>> /*
>>
>> --
>> https://github.com/git/git/pull/460
