Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > Jonathan Tan wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:26:58 -0500 >> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > >>> I agree that it shouldn't matter much here. But if the name argv_array >>> is standing in the way of using it, I think we should consider giving it >>> a more general name. I picked that not to evoke "this must be arguments" >>> but "this is terminated by a single NULL". > [...] >> This sounds reasonable - I withdraw my comment about using struct >> string_list. > > Marking with #leftoverbits as a reminder to think about what such a > more general name would be (or what kind of docs to put in > argv-array.h) and make it so the next time I do a search for that > keyword.
So are we looking for a natural name to call an array of trings? I personally do not mind argv_array too much, but perhaps we can call it a string_array and then everybody will be happy?
