On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:15:44AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > > > That's probably a reasonable sanity check, but I think we need to abort > > and not just have a too-small DISPLAY array. Because later code like the > > hunk-splitting is going to assume that there's a 1:1 line > > correspondence. We definitely don't want to end up in a situation where > > we show one thing but apply another. > > Yes, agreed completely.
Let's add this sanity check while we're thinking about it. Here's a series. [1/2]: t3701: add a test for interactive.diffFilter [2/2]: add--interactive: detect bogus diffFilter output git-add--interactive.perl | 8 ++++++++ t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) -Peff
