On 03/01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> writes:
>
> > +enum packet_read_status packet_reader_read(struct packet_reader *reader)
> > +{
> > + if (reader->line_peeked) {
> > + reader->line_peeked = 0;
> > + return reader->status;
> > + }
> > +
> > + reader->status = packet_read_with_status(reader->fd,
> > + &reader->src_buffer,
> > + &reader->src_len,
> > + reader->buffer,
> > + reader->buffer_size,
> > + &reader->pktlen,
> > + reader->options);
> > +
> > + switch (reader->status) {
> > + case PACKET_READ_EOF:
> > + reader->pktlen = -1;
> > + reader->line = NULL;
> > + break;
> > + case PACKET_READ_NORMAL:
> > + reader->line = reader->buffer;
> > + break;
> > + case PACKET_READ_FLUSH:
> > + reader->pktlen = 0;
> > + reader->line = NULL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return reader->status;
> > +}
>
> With the way _peek() interface interacts with the reader instance
> (which by the way I find is well designed), it is understandable
> that we want almost everything available in reader's fields, but
> having to manually clear pktlen field upon non NORMAL status feels
> a bit strange.
>
> Perhaps that is because the underlying packet_read_with_status()
> does not set *pktlen in these cases? Shouldn't it be doing that so
> the caller does not have to?
That's true, I'll fix that.
--
Brandon Williams
