On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Adam Spiers <g...@adamspiers.org> writes: > >> diff --git a/pathspec.h b/pathspec.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..8bb670b >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/pathspec.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >> +extern char *find_used_pathspec(const char **pathspec); >> +extern void fill_pathspec_matches(const char **pathspec, char *seen, int >> specs); >> +extern const char *treat_gitlink(const char *path); >> +extern void treat_gitlinks(const char **pathspec); >> +extern const char **validate_pathspec(const char **argv, const char >> *prefix); > > Protect this against multiple inclusion with "#ifndef PATHSPEC_H".
Yep good idea, how should I submit this? It will cause a trivially resolvable conflict with the next patch in the series (17/19): pathspec.c: extract new validate_path() for reuse but I'd prefer not to re-roll 16--19 when just 16 and 17 are sufficient. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
