> On 14 Mar 2018, at 18:02, Derrick Stolee <sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 3/14/2018 12:56 PM, Lars Schneider wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am investigating a Git merge (a86dd40fe) in which an older version of
>> a file won over the newer version. I try to understand why this is the
>> case. I can reproduce the merge with the following commands:
>> $ git checkout -b test a02fa3303
>> $ GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=5 git merge --verbose c1b82995c
>> 
>> The merge actually generates a merge conflict but not for my
>> problematic file. The common ancestor of the two parents (merge base)
>> is b91161554.
>> 
>> The merge graph is not pretty (the committers don't have a clean
>> branching scheme) but I cannot spot a problem between the merge commit
>> and the common ancestor:
>> $ git log --graph --oneline a86dd40fe
> 
> Have you tried `git log --graph --oneline --simplify-merges -- path` to see 
> what changes and merges involved the file? I find that view to be very 
> helpful (while the default history simplification can hide things). In 
> particular, if there was a change that was reverted in one side and not 
> another, we could find out.

Thanks for this tip! Unfortunately, this only confirms my current view:

### First parent
$ git log --graph --oneline --simplify-merges a02fa3303 -- path/to/problem
* 4e47a10c7 <-- old version
* 01f01f61c 

### Second parent
$ git log --graph --oneline --simplify-merges c1b82995c -- path/to/problem
* 590e52ed1 <-- new version
* 8e598828d 
* ad4e9034b 
* 4e47a10c7 
* 01f01f61c 

### Merge
$ git log --graph --oneline --simplify-merges a86dd40fe -- path/to/problem
*   a86dd40fe <-- old version ?!?! That's the problem!
|\
| * 590e52ed1 <-- new version
| * 8e598828d
| * ad4e9034b
|/
* 4e47a10c7 <-- old version
* 01f01f61c


> You could also use the "A...B" to check your two commits for merging, and 
> maybe add "--boundary".

$ git diff --boundary a02fa3303...c1b82995c -- path/to/problem

This looks like the correct diff. The "new version" is mark as +/add/green in 
the diff.

Does this make any sense to you?

Thank you,
Lars

Reply via email to