Jonathan Tan <jonathanta...@google.com> writes: > Our only definition (currently) for the "partial" fetch boundary is > whether an object in a promisor packfile (a packfile obtained from the > promisor remote) references it, so I think that checking for crossing a > "partial" fetch boundary does not add anything.
Ah, that's a perfect answer. When we find a link that leads to a missing object in a pack after receiving it from a remote repository that gives us promises, the missing object must be available from the remote repository by definition. Makes perfect sense ;-) Thanks.
