Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > IMHO we should do one of: > > 1. Nothing. ;) > > 2. Complain about "-l" in list mode to help educate users about the > current craziness.
Nah. We've seen this, perhaps not often but enough times over long period of time. The above two would not fly as a longer term solution. > > 3. Drop "-l" (probably with a deprecation period); it seems unlikely > to me that anybody uses it for branch creation, and this would at > least reduce the confusion (then it would just be "so why don't we > have -l" instead of "why is -l not what I expect"). > > 4. Repurpose "-l" as a shortcut for --list (also after a deprecation > period). This is slightly more dangerous in that it may confuse > people using multiple versions of Git that cross the deprecation > line. But that's kind of what the deprecation period is for... 3. is prerequisite for 4. If we haven't gone through both in 5 years we should be ashamed of ourselves ;-) But at least we should start 3. and aim to finish 3. in 2 years if not sooner.
