> I was just going by what the reported compiler error message was. > It said that "unsigned long" didn't match the uint64_t variable. > And that made me nervous. > > If all of the platforms we build on define uintmax_t >= 64 bits, > then it doesn't matter. > > If we do have a platform where uintmax_t is u32, then we'll have a > lot more breakage than in just the new function I added. > > Thanks, > Jeff
Should we add a "_Static_assert" that sizeof(uintmax_t) >= sizeof(uint64_t) ?
