There is a series running in parallel with this one that adds code
like this
switch (...) {
case ...:
die_initial_contact();
case ...:
There is nothing wrong with this. There is no actual falling
through. But since gcc is not that smart and gcc 7.x introduces
-Wimplicit-fallthrough, it raises a false alarm in this case.
This class of warnings may be useful elsewhere, so instead of
suppressing the whole class, let's try to fix just this code. gcc is
smart enough to realize that no execution can continue after a
NORETURN function call and no longer raises the warning.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
---
connect.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/connect.c b/connect.c
index c3a014c5ba..49eca46462 100644
--- a/connect.c
+++ b/connect.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ int check_ref_type(const struct ref *ref, int flags)
return check_ref(ref->name, flags);
}
-static void die_initial_contact(int unexpected)
+static NORETURN void die_initial_contact(int unexpected)
{
if (unexpected)
die(_("The remote end hung up upon initial contact"));
--
2.17.0.rc1.439.gca064e2955
