On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:29:01PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> If we have generic "can X reach Y?" queries, then we can also use generation
> numbers there to great effect (by not walking commits Z with gen(Z) <=
> gen(Y)). Perhaps I should look at that "git branch --contains" thread for
> ideas.
I think the gist of it is the patch below. Which I hastily adapted from
the patch we run at GitHub that uses timestamps as a proxy. So it's
possible I completely flubbed the logic. I'm assuming unavailable
generation numbers are set to 0; the logic is actually a bit simpler if
they end up as (uint32_t)-1.
Assuming it works, that would cover for-each-ref and tag. You'd probably
want to drop the "with_commit_tag_algo" flag in ref-filter.h, and just
use always use it by default (and that would cover "git branch").
---
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 45fc56216a..6bea6173d1 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1584,7 +1584,8 @@ static int in_commit_list(const struct commit_list *want,
struct commit *c)
*/
static enum contains_result contains_test(struct commit *candidate,
const struct commit_list *want,
- struct contains_cache *cache)
+ struct contains_cache *cache,
+ uint32_t cutoff)
{
enum contains_result *cached = contains_cache_at(cache, candidate);
@@ -1598,8 +1599,11 @@ static enum contains_result contains_test(struct commit
*candidate,
return CONTAINS_YES;
}
- /* Otherwise, we don't know; prepare to recurse */
parse_commit_or_die(candidate);
+
+ if (candidate->generation && candidate->generation < cutoff)
+ return CONTAINS_NO;
+
return CONTAINS_UNKNOWN;
}
@@ -1615,8 +1619,20 @@ static enum contains_result contains_tag_algo(struct
commit *candidate,
struct contains_cache *cache)
{
struct contains_stack contains_stack = { 0, 0, NULL };
- enum contains_result result = contains_test(candidate, want, cache);
+ enum contains_result result;
+ uint32_t cutoff = -1;
+ const struct commit_list *p;
+
+ for (p = want; p; p = p->next) {
+ struct commit *c = p->item;
+ parse_commit_or_die(c);
+ if (c->generation && c->generation < cutoff )
+ cutoff = c->generation;
+ }
+ if (cutoff == -1)
+ cutoff = 0;
+ result = contains_test(candidate, want, cache, cutoff);
if (result != CONTAINS_UNKNOWN)
return result;
@@ -1634,7 +1650,7 @@ static enum contains_result contains_tag_algo(struct
commit *candidate,
* If we just popped the stack, parents->item has been marked,
* therefore contains_test will return a meaningful yes/no.
*/
- else switch (contains_test(parents->item, want, cache)) {
+ else switch (contains_test(parents->item, want, cache, cutoff))
{
case CONTAINS_YES:
*contains_cache_at(cache, commit) = CONTAINS_YES;
contains_stack.nr--;
@@ -1648,7 +1664,7 @@ static enum contains_result contains_tag_algo(struct
commit *candidate,
}
}
free(contains_stack.contains_stack);
- return contains_test(candidate, want, cache);
+ return contains_test(candidate, want, cache, cutoff);
}
static int commit_contains(struct ref_filter *filter, struct commit *commit,