On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Shawn Pearce <spea...@spearce.org> wrote: >> And I was wrong. At least since 1b4bb16 (pack-objects: optimize >> "recency order" - 2011-06-30) commits are spread out and can be mixed >> with trees too. Grouping them back defeats what Junio did in that >> commit, I think. > > I think you misunderstand what 1b4bb16 does. Junio uses a layout > similar to what JGit has done for years. Commits are packed, then > trees, then blobs. Only annotated tags are interspersed with commits. > The decision on where to place tags is different, but has a similar > purpose.
This is embarrassing. I looked at verify-pack output and somehow saw trees mixed with commits. I must have read it wrong. "git verify-pack -v <pack>|awk '{print $2;}'|uniq on recently created pack shows that only tags and commits are mixed. Sorry for the noise. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html