Sure, I'll take a crack at it and submit a patch.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Casey Fitzpatrick <kcgh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This seems to be a hole in the git feature set. I believe it is fairly
>> easily worked around, but it would be best to provide the option for
>> ease of use (and maybe performance?).
>>
>> git clone has both a --reference feature and a --dissociate option,
>> with dissociate allowing for a reference to *only* speed up network
>> transfers rather than have the resulting clone rely upon the reference
>> always being there (creates an independent repo).
>
> With the advent of git-worktree, I claim that --reference without further
> --dissociate is dangerous, such that the combination of these two are
> not the best UX, you could wish for.
>
>> But git submodule only allows for --reference, so there isn't a an
>> option to make a speedy independent submodule clone in one shot:
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule
>> I checked the latest online documentation (currently at 2.16.3) and
>> the documentation in the latest sources (almost 2.18):
>> https://github.com/git/git/blob/next/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
>>
>> As far as I am aware this can be worked around with 'git repack -a'
>> and manual removal of the objects/info/alternates file afterward.
>> Though I don't know if this results in a less speedy clone than
>> dissociate would.
>
> That is an interesting workaround!
> I agree we should have the --dissociate option available for submodules.
> Care to implement it?
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan

Reply via email to