Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > My knee-jerk response was "If the options are currently organized logically, > wouldn't it be more appropriate to add a sub-heading for each group of options > and alphabetize only within the subgroups?" > > But in fact the current options list doesn't seem to be well organized at all. > What do you think would be a logical way to group these? > > Features of input syntax > > --date-format > --done > > Verbosity > > --quiet > --stats > > Marks handling (checkpoint/restore) > > --import-marks > --import-marks-if-exists > --export-marks > --relative-marks > > Semantics of execution > > --dry-run > --force > --cat-blob-fd > --export-pack-edges > > Tuning > > --active-branches > --max-pack-size > --big-file-threshold > --depth
Sounds sensible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
