Hi Philip, On Fri, 4 May 2018, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> > > From: Thomas Rast <t...@thomasrast.ch> > > > > These are essentially lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff, with > > light touch-ups to account for the new command name. > > > > Apart from renaming `tbdiff` to `branch-diff`, only one test case needed > > to be adjusted: 11 - 'changed message'. > > > > The underlying reason it had to be adjusted is that diff generation is > > sometimes ambiguous. In this case, a comment line and an empty line are > > added, but it is ambiguous whether they were added after the existing > > empty line, or whether an empty line and the comment line are added > > *before* the existing emtpy line. And apparently xdiff picks a different > > s/emtpy/empty/ Yep, that has been pointed out by others, too... ;-) It is good that this thing gets a really good review *grins* Ciao, Dscho
