Hi Peff, On Mon, 7 May 2018, Jeff King wrote:
> The git-scm.com site currently links to https://github.com/git/git for > the (non-tarball) source code. Somebody raised the question[1] of > whether it should point to kernel.org instead. > > Do people find one interface more or less pleasing than the other? Do we > want to prefer kernel.org as more "official" or less commercial? I don't really care about "official" vs "commercial", as kernel.org is also run by a business, so it is all "commercial" to me. Personally, I prefer the GitHub interface. A *lot*. Why? - it is faster - it is prettier - you can fork easily - it also has the Continuous Integration, well, integrated - it is a lot easier to link to individual commits/files/lines - the links are *a lot* nicer - you can provide a <repo>/compare/A...B link to a specific, possibly dynamic commit range I do not have anything against listing kernel.org, *in addition*. But kernel.org is just simply so much more limited, and less pretty, so I really think that the PR is misguided and would do more harm than good. Ciao, Dscho
