Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> It's done so that commit->util can be removed. See more explanation in
> the commit that removes commit->util.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  sequencer.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 4ce5120e77..6b785c6c5f 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include "hashmap.h"
>  #include "notes-utils.h"
>  #include "sigchain.h"
> +#include "commit-slab.h"
>  
>  #define GIT_REFLOG_ACTION "GIT_REFLOG_ACTION"
>  
> @@ -3160,6 +3161,7 @@ static enum check_level 
> get_missing_commit_check_level(void)
>       return CHECK_IGNORE;
>  }
>  
> +define_commit_slab(commit_seen, uint8_t);

Because it makes no difference on any real platform that matters, it
is purely academic preference, but the user of this code does not
care about ensuring that commit-seen data is at lesat 8-bit wide,
which is where we should use uint8_t.  We know this is a simple
yes/no field, so use of "uint8_t" here is quite misleading to the
readers.  "unsigned char" or "char" would be a lot better.

Reply via email to