On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 02:40:57PM -0700, Brandon Williams wrote:
> > > > Most fellow German software engineers (who seem to have a knack for
> > > > idiotically long variable/function names) would now probably suggest:
> > > >
> > > > git compare-patch-series-with-revised-patch-series
> > >
> > > or short:
> > >
> > > revision-compare
> > > compare-revs
> > > com-revs
> > >
> > > revised-diff
> > > revise-diff
> > > revised-compare
> > >
> > > diff-revise
>
> I haven't really been following all of the discussion but from what I
> can tell the point of this command is to generate a diff based on two
> different versions of a series, so why not call it 'series-diff'? :)
That's OK with me, though I prefer "range" as I think we use that term
elsewhere ("series" is usually part of "patch series", but many people
do not use a workflow with that term).
-Peff
