Martin Ågren <martin.ag...@gmail.com> writes: > (Maybe not to fix the leaking as such, but to keep 'maint' more up to > date with 'master' for easier merging of other topics?)
I admit that I occasionally do such a "presumably no-op" merge to 'maint' out of sheer laziness, but in general I'd prefer to keep 'maint' quieter than that. As we do not have any repeated caller that calls unpack_trees unbounded number of times in a process, I think it is OK to limit this update only to 'master', especially at this late in the cycle. Thanks.
