On Thursday 17 May 2018 07:06 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> But because git-branch does not kick in the pager until later
> (because it only wants to do it for list-mode), that happens _after_
> we've emitted the message.
> 

I observe exactly the consequence of this behaviour. First, the error
is emitted and then the pager kicks in to list the branches.


> On the other hand, I'm not sure this is that big a deal. The point of
> the deprecation warning is to catch people who are actually trying to
> use "-l" as "--create-reflog", and that case does not page. The people
> doing "git branch -l" are actually getting what they want eventually,
> which is to turn it into "--list". In the interim step where it becomes
> an unknown option, they'll get a hard error. 

I just thought we wouldn't want to surprise/confuse users who try to
use "git branch -l" with the warning message about "create reflog"
along-side the list of branches. That would just add to the confusion.
So, I thought we should error out when users do "git branch -l"
instead. Something like the following should help us prevent "git
branch -l" from listing branch names and might also prevent the
confusion.


diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index 452742fec..f3c5181bb 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char 
*prefix)
        argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_branch_usage,
                             0);
 
-       if (!delete && !rename && !copy && !edit_description && !new_upstream 
&& !unset_upstream && argc == 0)
+       if (!delete && !rename && !copy && !edit_description && !new_upstream 
&& !unset_upstream && !reflog && argc == 0)
                list = 1;
 
        if (filter.with_commit || filter.merge != REF_FILTER_MERGED_NONE || 
filter.points_at.nr ||


-- 
Kaartic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to