On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Christian Couder
<christian.cou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As there are plans to implement other ref storage systems,
> let's use a way to remove remote refs that does not depend
> on refs being files.
>
> This makes it clear to readers that this test does not
> depend on which ref backend is used.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu>
> Helped-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chrisc...@tuxfamily.org>
> ---
> This was suggested and discussed in:
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180525085906.ga2...@sigill.intra.peff.net/
>
>  t/t9104-git-svn-follow-parent.sh | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t9104-git-svn-follow-parent.sh 
> b/t/t9104-git-svn-follow-parent.sh
> index 9c49b6c1fe..5e0ad19177 100755
> --- a/t/t9104-git-svn-follow-parent.sh
> +++ b/t/t9104-git-svn-follow-parent.sh
> @@ -215,7 +215,9 @@ test_expect_success "multi-fetch continues to work" "
>         "
>
>  test_expect_success "multi-fetch works off a 'clean' repository" '
> -       rm -rf "$GIT_DIR/svn" "$GIT_DIR/refs/remotes" &&
> +       rm -rf "$GIT_DIR/svn" &&
> +       git for-each-ref --format="option no-deref%0adelete %(refname)" 
> refs/remotes |
> +       git update-ref --stdin &&
>         git reflog expire --all --expire=all &&
>         mkdir "$GIT_DIR/svn" &&
>         git svn multi-fetch
> --
> 2.17.0.1035.g12039e008f

+1 LGTM.

Michael

Reply via email to