On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 10:52:33PM +02h00, hPeter Backes wrote:
> But I will take your message as saying you at least don't see any
> obvious criticism leading to complete rejection of the approach.
If you don't think a potential 2x -- 10x performance hit isn't a
blocking factor --- sure, go ahead and try implementing it. And good
luck to you. And this is not a guarantee that it won't get rejected.
I certainly don't have the power to make that guarantee.
If you don't have time to implement, why do you think it's fair to
inflict on everyone else the request for time to do a design review
for something for which the need hasn't even been established?
Regards,
- Ted
