On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:20:57PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > +#define PATHSPEC_FROMTOP (1<<0)
The previous commit introduces a use of this macro in get_pathspec. Should this be defined by that commit instead? > @@ -266,9 +266,9 @@ static int pathspec_item_cmp(const void *a_, const void > *b_) > * Given command line arguments and a prefix, convert the input to > * pathspec. die() if any magic other than ones in magic_mask. > */ > -static void parse_pathspec(struct pathspec *pathspec, > - unsigned magic_mask, unsigned flags, > - const char *prefix, const char **argv) > +void parse_pathspec(struct pathspec *pathspec, > + unsigned magic_mask, unsigned flags, The prototype for this function uses just "magic" instead of "magic_mask". Should they be consistent? -- Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
