On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 5:25 PM Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This test manually checks the exit code of git-grep for a particular
> value. In doing so, it intentionally breaks the &&-chain. Modernize the
> test by taking advantage of test_expect_code() and a normal &&-chain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <[email protected]>
> ---
> t/t7810-grep.sh | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t7810-grep.sh b/t/t7810-grep.sh
> index 1797f632a3..fecee602c1 100755
> --- a/t/t7810-grep.sh
> +++ b/t/t7810-grep.sh
> @@ -845,10 +845,9 @@ test_expect_success 'grep from a subdirectory to search
> wider area (1)' '
> test_expect_success 'grep from a subdirectory to search wider area (2)' '
> mkdir -p s &&
> (
> - cd s || exit 1
> - ( git grep xxyyzz .. >out ; echo $? >status )
> - ! test -s out &&
> - test 1 = $(cat status)
> + cd s &&
> + test_expect_code 1 git grep xxyyzz .. >out &&
> + ! test -s out
> )
Further optimisation would be possible if I understand the code correctly:
test_expect_code git -C s grep xxyyzz .. >../out
test_must_be_empty out
(dropping the subshell entirely)
> '
>
> --
> 2.18.0.203.gfac676dfb9
>
