On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:58:32AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 10:24:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> What we've been avoiding was the comma after the last element in the
> >> enum (in other words, if PGP_FMT had ',' after it in the above
> >> quoted addition, that would have been violation of that rule), as
> >> having such a trailing comma used to be ANSI C violation as well.  I
> >> do not recall offhand if we loosened that deliberately.
> >> 
> >> 4b05548f ("enums: omit trailing comma for portability", 2010-05-14),
> >> c9b6782a ("enums: omit trailing comma for portability", 2011-03-16)
> >
> > I think we accidentally did a weather-balloon in e1327023ea (grep:
> > refactor the concept of "grep source" into an object, 2012-02-02).
> > It's still there and nobody has complained about it yet.
> >
> > So I think we can consider that requirement loosened at this point.
> >
> > -Peff
> 
> Yup, thanks for digging it out.  It seems that I did the same
> digging some time ago but forgot about it.

I actually cheated and just searched for "enum, comma" in my list
archive and found your message. ;)

-Peff

Reply via email to