"brian m. carlson" <sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> writes: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:08:28PM -0400, Ben Peart wrote: >> >> >> On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 10:45:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > > As Brandon alludes to downthread, we probably should use strbuf for >> > > things like this these days, so a preliminary clean-up to do so is >> > > probably a welcome change to sneak in and rebase this series on top >> > > of. >> > >> > Sure, I agree that would be a better change, and I'm happy to reroll >> > with that. >> > >> >> I've put together a patch to update log_ref_write_fd() to use strbuf and >> will submit it shortly. > > Excellent. I'll drop this patch in that case.
OK, thanks for working well together. In the integration run I did yesterday evening, this part was resolved by taking what Ben did, dropping the s/100/200/ change from this series, and the result looked reasonable, of course.
