On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:03 PM Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:57 AM Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> 
> wrote:
> > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > +void show_interdiff(struct rev_info *rev)
> > +{
> > +       struct diff_options opts;
> > +
> > +       memcpy(&opts, &rev->diffopt, sizeof(opts));
> > +       opts.output_format = DIFF_FORMAT_PATCH;
> > +       diff_setup_done(&opts);
> > +
> > +       diff_tree_oid(rev->idiff_oid1, rev->idiff_oid2, "", &opts);
> > +       diffcore_std(&opts);
> > +       diff_flush(&opts);
> > +}
>
> Is it worth adding a new file just for a single function? I haven't
> read the rest of the series, but the cover letter's diffstat suggests
> this is it. Is interdiff intended to become a lot more complicated in
> the future? If not maybe just add this function in diff-lib.c

Good question. The functionality originally lived in builtin/log.c but
moved to log-tree.c when I added the ability to embed an interdiff in
a single patch. However, it didn't "feel" right in log-tree.c, so I
moved it to its own file to mirror how the range-diff engine resides
in its own file.

And, the function actually did several more things as originally
implemented. For instance, it took care of not clobbering global
diff-queue state, and consulting 'reroll_count' and printing the
"Interdiff:" header, but those bits eventually moved to live at more
"correct" locations, leaving this relatively minimal function behind.
It does get a bit more complex in a later patch, but not significantly
so.

I wasn't aware of diff-lib.c, but it does seem like show_interdiff()
could be at home there.

Reply via email to