On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:38:20 -0700 Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Antonio Ospite <a...@ao2.it> writes: > > >> I also do not see a reason why we want to stop referring to > >> .gitmodules explicitly by name. We do not hide the fact that > >> in-tree .gitignore and .gitattributes files are used to hold the > >> metainformation about the project tree, saying that it is an > >> implementation detail. Is there a good reason why .gitmodules > >> should be different from these other two? > > > > Not sure about that, but one difference I can see > > between .gitignore/.gitattributes and .gitmodules is that I got the > > impression that editing the latter by hand is strongly discouraged, if > > that is indeed the case a layer of indirection can make sense IMHO to > > make the actual file path less relevant. > > I do not think we discourage hand editing of .gitmodules more than > others, say .gitignore; and I do not see a sane reason to do so. > > "If you commit broken .gitmodules and let another person clone it, > submodules will not be checked out correctly" is *not* a sane > reason, as exactly the same thing can be said for incorrect checkout > of files with broken .gitattributes. > OK, I see, maybe I got the wrong impression because while .gitignore/.gitattributes are expected to be hand edited, in my limited usage of submodules I never had to edit .gitmodules manually since git did it for me; I guess that does not necessarily mean it's discouraged and it may even be necessary for more advanced usages. > Quite honestly, I just want to get over with this minor detail that > won't help any scripts (after all submodule--helper is not meant to > be used by humans) and focus on other parts of the patch series. Agreed, let's drop 06 and 07 then. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
