We do n-way merge by walking the source index and n trees at the same time and add merge results to a new temporary index called o->result. The merge result for any given path could be either
- keep_entry(): same old index entry in o->src_index is reused - merged_entry(): either a new entry is added, or an existing one updated - deleted_entry(): one entry from o->src_index is removed For some reason [1] we keep making sure that the source index's cache-tree is still valid if used by o->result: for all those merged/deleted entries, we invalidate the same path in o->src_index, so only cache-trees covering the "keep_entry" parts remain good. Because of this, the cache-tree from o->src_index can be perfectly reused in o->result. And in fact we already rely on this logic to reuse untracked cache in edf3b90553 (unpack-trees: preserve index extensions - 2017-05-08). Move the cache-tree to o->result before doing cache_tree_update() to reduce hashing cost. Since cache_tree_update() has risen up as one of the most expensive parts in unpack_trees() after the last few patches. This does help reduce unpack_trees() time significantly (on webkit.git): before after -------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.080394752 0.051258167 s: read cache .git/index 0.216010838 0.212106298 s: preload index 0.008534301 0.280521764 s: refresh index 0.251992198 0.218160442 s: traverse_trees 0.377031383 0.374948191 s: check_updates 0.372768105 0.037040114 s: cache_tree_update 1.045887251 0.672031609 s: unpack_trees 0.314983512 0.317456290 s: write index, changed mask = 2e 0.062572653 0.038382654 s: traverse_trees 0.000022544 0.000042731 s: check_updates 0.073795585 0.050930053 s: unpack_trees 0.073807557 0.051099735 s: diff-index 1.938191592 1.614241153 s: git command: git checkout - [1] I'm pretty sure the reason is an oversight in 34110cd4e3 (Make 'unpack_trees()' have a separate source and destination index - 2008-03-06). That patch aims to _not_ update the source index at all. The invalidation should have been done on o->result in that patch. But then there was no cache-tree on o->result even then so it's pointless to do so. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> --- read-cache.c | 2 ++ unpack-trees.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c index 1c9c88c130..5ce40f39b3 100644 --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -2940,6 +2940,8 @@ void move_index_extensions(struct index_state *dst, struct index_state *src) { dst->untracked = src->untracked; src->untracked = NULL; + dst->cache_tree = src->cache_tree; + src->cache_tree = NULL; } struct cache_entry *dup_cache_entry(const struct cache_entry *ce, diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c index dbef6e1b8a..aa80b65ee1 100644 --- a/unpack-trees.c +++ b/unpack-trees.c @@ -1576,6 +1576,7 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options ret = check_updates(o) ? (-2) : 0; if (o->dst_index) { + move_index_extensions(&o->result, o->src_index); if (!ret) { if (!o->result.cache_tree) o->result.cache_tree = cache_tree(); @@ -1584,7 +1585,6 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options WRITE_TREE_SILENT | WRITE_TREE_REPAIR); } - move_index_extensions(&o->result, o->src_index); discard_index(o->dst_index); *o->dst_index = o->result; } else { -- 2.18.0.1004.g6639190530