Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with > '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of > the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
Mentors (and GSoC students), Two topics your students have worked on conflict heavily at the philosophical level; "rebase in C" rewrite assumes that backend implementations are forever written in shell and can be invoked by dot-sourcing ". git-rebase--$backend", while violating that assumption is the whole point of "rebase-i in C" rewrite. Trying to use them together would of course not work without a bit of "last mile" further glue. I do not think neither topic is ready for the upcoming release, but can you help your students to come up with "the final step" to make the fruits of their effort work well together? Thanks.
