Hi, Stefan Beller wrote:
> This is the continuation of f2d48994dc1 (submodule.c: submodule_move_head > works with broken submodules, 2017-04-18), which tones down the case of > "broken submodule" in case of a missing git directory of the submodule to > be only a warning. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> > --- > submodule.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > t/t2013-checkout-submodule.sh | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) I don't understand what workflow this is a part of. If the submodule is missing, shouldn't we make it non-missing instead of producing a partial checkout that doesn't build? Thanks, Jonathan
