On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:10:44PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> > Probably:
> >
> > [include]
> > warnOnMissing = false
> > path = ...
>
> I was going to suggest, inspired by Makefile syntax, that
> [-include] would not complain if the file was missing ...
> except, of course, it's too late for that! ;-)
>
> I suppose [+include] could complain if the file is missing
> instead, ... dunno.
I think that's syntactically invalid. At any rate, there are clearly
three options for setting a bit:
1. In the section header (+include, or Ævar's includeIf suggestion).
2. In another key (which looks pretty clean, but does introduce
ordering constraints).
3. In the key name (maybePath or similar).
I don't have a huge preference between them.
-Peff
