Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes:
> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]>
> ---
> sha1-array.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> sha1-array.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sha1-array.c b/sha1-array.c
> index 265941fbf40..76323935dd7 100644
> --- a/sha1-array.c
> +++ b/sha1-array.c
> @@ -77,3 +77,21 @@ int oid_array_for_each_unique(struct oid_array *array,
> }
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +int oid_array_filter(struct oid_array *array,
> + for_each_oid_fn fn,
It probably makes sense to call it "want" instead of "fn" to match
object_array_filter().
> + void *cbdata)
> +{
> + int src, dst;
> +
> + for (src = dst = 0; src < array->nr; src++) {
> + if (fn(&array->oid[src], cbdata)) {
> + if (dst < src)
> + oidcpy(&array->oid[dst], &array->oid[src]);
> + dst++;
> + }
In fact, matching the implementation of object_array_fiter() may
also make sense, as I do not see a strong reason why the resulting
code would become better by rewriting "dst != src" over there to
"dst < src" here.
> + }
> + array->nr = dst;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/sha1-array.h b/sha1-array.h
> index 232bf950172..a2d7c210835 100644
> --- a/sha1-array.h
> +++ b/sha1-array.h
> @@ -23,4 +23,9 @@ int oid_array_for_each_unique(struct oid_array *array,
> for_each_oid_fn fn,
> void *data);
>
> +/* Call fn for each oid, and remove it if fn returns 0, retain it otherwise
> */
Also perhaps mimic the wording of object_array_filter()'s comment?
I find it easier that the latter says "retaining only if X" instead
of saying "remove if !X, retain otherwise"; it's both shorter and
more to the point. It also is nicer that it notes that the order is
preserved.
> +int oid_array_filter(struct oid_array *array,
> + for_each_oid_fn fn,
> + void *cbdata);
> +
Other than that, the function makes sense very much, and the
callsite we see in patch 8/9 does, too.
Thanks.
> #endif /* SHA1_ARRAY_H */
