Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:

>> I'd rather that we revert this change altogether.  I have nothing
>> against a convenient command to do this kind of non build related
>> cleanup, but it shouldn't be spelled as "make clean".
>
> OK, let's do this for now as I wanted to merge the remainder to
> 'master' today.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: Revert "doc/Makefile: drop doc-diff worktree and temporary files on 
> "make clean""
>
> This reverts commit 6f924265a0bf6efa677e9a684cebdde958e5ba06, which
> started to require that we have an executable git available in order
> to say "make clean", which gives us a chicken-and-egg problem.
>
> Having to have Git installed, or be in a repository, in order to be
> able to run an optional "doc-diff" tool is fine.  Requiring either
> in order to run "make clean" is a different story.
>
> Reported by Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>.
> ---
>  Documentation/Makefile | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Does this want a sign-off?

In any event, this matches what I had applied in Debian[1] and is

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>

Thanks,
Jonathan

[1] 
http://repo.or.cz/git/debian.git/blob/refs/heads/debian-experimental:/debian/patches/0002-Revert-doc-Makefile-drop-doc-diff-worktree-and-tempor.diff
aka 
http://repo.or.cz/git/debian.git/blob/9872ab1d87634a9288266de290571928e5b9346f:/debian/patches/0002-Revert-doc-Makefile-drop-doc-diff-worktree-and-tempor.diff

Reply via email to