On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:19:39PM +0100, Per Cederqvist wrote: > On 01/16/13 03:26, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >Hi Jeff and other guilty parties, > > > >I collected all the guilt patches I could find on-list and added one > >of my own. Completely untested, except for running the regression > >tests. These are also available via git protocol from > > > > git://repo.or.cz/guilt/mob.git mob > > > >Thoughts? > > Regarding the "Change git branch when patches are applied" feature, > it has saved me a number of times since I implemented it. I've been > using it extensively, and have not had any problems with it. > > Nevertheless, for backwards compatibility with the currently > released guilt version I think it should be conditional, and > disabled per default for one full release cycle. I've implemented > this. My code is available from git://repo.or.cz/guilt/ceder.git > > The following commits are not included in your list: > > a194375 Added guilt.reusebranch configuration option. > 1dd97bd Minor testsuite fix. > 640caee The tests should not fail if guilt.diffstat is set.
At $WORK, we started doing thorough reviews before committing. I'm kinda sold on this feature. I agree with the off-by-default config flag. > I don't want Guilt to fork. Jeff, it would be really great if > you could set up a public repo again! Yep. I'm trying to reclaim control of the repo.or.cz guilt repo... I no longer have access to jsi...@cs.sunysb.edu and I don't remember the password. Jeff. -- NT is to UNIX what a doughnut is to a particle accelerator. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
