On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:42:48AM +0000, Tacitus Aedifex wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:48:49PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > We do not want your choice of gpg.program or what kind of
> > trust you have personally recorded in your ~/.gnupg/ affect how gpg
> > invoked inside our tests work.
> 
> This makes sense to me now. I get what you are saying. The gpg binary
> installed on my system is fairly new:
> 
> gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.8
> libgcrypt 1.8.3
> Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> 
> Home: /home/user/.gnupg
> Supported algorithms:
> Pubkey: RSA, ELG, DSA, ECDH, ECDSA, EDDSA
> Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH,
>        CAMELLIA128, CAMELLIA192, CAMELLIA256
> Hash: SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
> Compression: Uncompressed

I'm using GnuPG 2.2.10 from Debian unstable on my system and I don't see
this issue.

> I'm not sure if that has anything to do with it. I'm going to have to
> investigate further to figure out what is being executed and with what
> parameters that leads to the prerefences prompt. While working with GPG on
> another project I noticed that GPG doesn't like to work with keyrings other
> than the default ones. I tried a bunch of different combinations of
> --no-default-keyrings, --homedir, --default-key, etc to try to get GPG to
> never touch ~/.gnupg and I couldn't figure it out. It would always re-create
> ~/.gnupg and default keyrings and even read gpg.conf when explicitly told
> not to. I suspect that is what is going on here.

It might be worth checking to see if you have a gpg binary or script in
your PATH that isn't the one you expect.  That's broken things for me in
the past.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to