On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 6:39 AM Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@talktalk.net> wrote: > > If you mean "--color-moved-ws=no" (or "--no-color-moved-ws") as a > > way to countermand an earlier --color-moved-ws=<something> on the > > command line, I fully agree that it is a good idea. > > Oh I assumed --no-color-moved-ws was allowed but it isn't it. Allowing > --color-moved-ws=no as well would match what is allowed for > --color-moved. I'll try and look at that.
Thanks for taking a look! Stefan
