On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:02 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-10-18 at 17:53 -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:16 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhac...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > Implementation complexity aside, spelling the option --no-smtp-auth > > might be more intuitive and consistent than --smtp-auth=none. > > One advantage of --smtp-auth=none is that it can also be done with a > config variable sendemail.smtpauth="none". Would be also add a config > variable like sendemail.nosmtpauth (the negative seems strange to me)?
I would not expect to see a "negating" config variable like that. I was just suggesting that a "--no-*" command-line option might be more intuitive. > Or maybe --no-smtp-auth is just a shorthand alias for --smtp-auth=none? That's one possibility.
