SZEDER Gábor <szeder....@gmail.com> writes: >> To prevent that from happening, let's append `^0` after the stash hash, >> to make sure that it is interpreted as an OID rather than as a number. > > Oh, this is clever.
Yeah, we can do this as we know we'd be dealing with a commit-ish. If we made a mistake to use a tree object to represent a stash, this trick wouldn't have been possible ;-) > FWIW, all patches look good to me, barring the typo below. > ... >> + /* Ensure that the hash is not mistake for a number */ > > s/mistake/mistaken/ Will squash this in and add your reviewed-by before queuing. Thanks, both.
