On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:08 AM Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> For a single-use, not using the macro and just using "%s", "" should
> suffice.
OK, will send it as v2 then but would think it will be better if
applied as a "fixup" on top of the original branch:
34b47315d9 ("rebase -i: move rebase--helper modes to
rebase--interactive", 2018-09-27)
would be a good idea to include also enabling this warning in
developer mode so it doesn't sneak back?, presume as the last patch of
the refactor below?, FWIW this is the only case in current pu, and I
suspect the sooner we add it to next the less likely we will find
more.
> If we want to hide the "%s", "" trickery from distracting
> the readers (which is what you are trying to address with your
> touch_file() proposal, I think, and I also suspect that it may be a
> legitimate one), I tend to think that it may be a better solution to
> introduce the EMPTY_PRINTF_ARG macro and use it everywhere, in
> builtin/commit.c, builtin/difftool.c and wt-status.c and not not
> just here.
will work on this in a different feature branch, but I had to admit I
don't like it for status_printf case where it was IMHO a hack to get
the new lines to begin with.
I would think it would make more sense to call a function that says
"write_ttycolor_ln" instead for those cases.
Carlo
